Notes: The form of the letter f is noteworthy. It has the basic shape 8, but angular, and the bottom portion is incomplete.

Notes: The text appears to be a funerary inscription. The editor suggests the following interpretation: σ(e)θ(re) aspa ⅩⅬ.

Notes: Presumably, the verb turce is to be supplied.

Notes: The final vertical stroke in line 1 is most likely an error.

Notes: Punctuation is in the form of three puncts aligned vertically.

Notes: The editor restores the beginning of fragment as [cl]an 'son'.

Notes: The inscription was incised in dextroverse direction. The sigma spelling the palatal sibilant /š/ has four bars.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: The text was painted on the shoulder of the amphora, which is fragmentary. The editor notes that the orthography (k before e) and the family name flere point to Volsinii as the source for the amphora and the inscription. The editor suggests that the two persons named here were magistrates at Volsinii and that their names served to date the year the wine was produced.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: Alpha is tilted onto its left side. Beta and delta are in dextrograde ductus.

Notes:

Notes: Bibliography:

1. Quercioli, M. 2001. Luni sul Mignone: Etruschi e Micenei. A cura di Bettina L. Knapp, Antemnae, Rassegna di archeolgia, arte, storia e letteratura 3.138-143 (fig. 1-5).

Notes:

Notes: Text (a) consists of two utterances: a proprietary text (line 1) followed by a dedication (lines 2-3). The gentilicium, kanzina, is uninflected and should probably be restored as a feminine genitive singular, kanzinaia, in agreement with the first name. The verb muluvace is misspelled. Read muluva(ni)ce. Text (b) was incised in dextroverse direction. This is probably the 'signature' of the artisan.

Notes:

Notes: The inscription has two constituents: (a) a proprietary text (mi : raq[u]nθa : tipeia : θina : ), which is followed by (b) a dedication malaχ [: malaka]si : ita : mena[q]u).

Notes: Of the initial f only the leftmost portions (of curved strokes) are visible. The final letter is difficult to read, but it appears to be an alpha with the medial stroke ascending in the direction of writing. Bibliography:

• Sgubini Moretti, Anna Maria (a cura di). 2001. Veio, Cerveteri, Vulci. Città d’Etruria a confronto. Catalogo della Mostra. Roma: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider. [The inscription is on pp. 18-19 (F.Fu.). It is dated to 480-470.]

Notes: This fragment belongs to the same piece of ceramic as that with Rix Ve 3.44 ([m]ini nuluvanice lari.s. leθaie.s.). Both inscriptions were incised by the same hand. /s/ has the form of the cross, X. A slender portion of the rightmost stroke of theta is visible. The first word may be an error for mini, the acc. form of the 1st pronoun.

Notes: Replicas of this flask and inscription have been found at Bolsena (3), Roma (1), Caere (2) and Vulci (1). For the inscription from Vulci see ETP 112.

Notes: Theta has no medial strokes or punct. Ny has the form H, but with the medial sloping slightly in the direction of writing.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: Inscription (a) was incised around the rim of the bronze. (b) runs vertically starting just below the first letter of the last word. Inscription (b) may be restored as tite θve[θlies turce].

Notes: The inscription was painted in two lines on the cask of the sarcophagus.

Notes: The letters were incised upside down in dextrograde ductus on the external wall of the vase.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: The editor believes that the inscription was incised by two hands. Letters 1-9 are rather large; the rest of the letters are considerably smaller.

Notes:

Notes: The /š/ in σuris is a 4-bar sigma.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: The text was stamped on the handle of the strigile.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: Of letters three and four only the vertical bars are visible. Colonna proposes to read mi ti[tes – – – ].

Notes: Colonna notes that the surviving portion of the text may be restored as [ – – – ]alik[e – – – ].

Notes: The topmost portions of four letters are visible. The editor proposes to read mi vi[pies – – – ].

Notes: The text is perhaps to be restored as the personal name lai[ve] or the family name lai[venas].

Notes:

Notes: The upper oblique stroke of the first letter is visible. v or p are possible.

Notes: The text was inscribed vertically, from high to low.

Notes: In the lacuna, there is space for four or five letters. Colonna proposes to restore the text as: mi l[ursl l]aruniθla.

Notes: The inscription was incised in dextroverse direction.

Notes: The inscription was incised in dextroverse direction.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: Bibliography:

• Wallace, Rex E. To appear 2006. Etruscan Inscriptions on Fragments of Bucchero Kyathoi Recovered at Poggio Civitate. SE 71.

Notes: The editor notes that the family name could also be restored as is[nas].

Notes: Colonna describes the /p/ as having a hook, and writes that the /q/ has a very small circle.

Notes: Spacing between the words.

Notes: Found inscribed vertically on the handles of four bucchero kantharoi on high pedastals.

Notes: Right-handed cup found on a high pedastal in the tomb of a child.

Notes: Found near the via Cavallegeri, a dwelling at the entrance to a stone circle. The last eight letters of the second inscription were written in a straight, upright fashion. The theta, specifically, is angular, and the rho has an asymmetric curve.

Notes: Written circularly on the inside of the vessel.

Notes:

Notes: Found at outside of tomb belonging to a man 25-30 years old near stone circle. Bucchero cup with receding hem.

Notes: Found at the tomb of a woman about 60 years old. The first inscription is on the body of the vessel and is written in a continuously expanding script. The second inscription is written on the bottom in very small letters and in different hands, suggesting that it may be very old. The theta is crossed.

Notes: Found at the tomb of a woman about 60 years old. The first inscription is on the body of the vessel and is writting in a continuously expanding script. The second inscription is written on the bottom in very small letters and in different hands, suggesting that it may be very old. The theta is crossed.

Notes: Found above tomb 2720 at Pontecagnano.

Notes: Belonged to a woman of 45-55 years of age. The inscription was carved on the inside in a long curve around the edge. The theta has a vertical cross, and the second /i/ was added as a pseudoligature to the /r/.

Notes: The theta is pointed.

Notes: This piece was found in the same site as PC 6, at a dwelling near the via Cavalleggeri.

Notes: The kylix lacks a lip. The third /u/ could be another /l/. The inscription was written circularly around the inside of the vessel.

Notes: The kylix lacks a foot and a handle. Its precise origin is unknown, although P. Laveglia suspects Salerno. The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel in a spiral near the edge.

Notes: A single-handled cup with the surviving straps. The inscription was written dextroverse on the outside of the vessel. /m/ was written slanted and /e/ was written horizontally.

Notes: A single-handled cup with the surviving straps. The inscription was written dextroverse on the outside of the vessel. /m/ was written slanted and /e/ was written horizontally.

Notes: Has the same origin as PC 18 (Colonna). The inscription was written upside down on the outside of the bowl, pressed into the base.

Notes: Hemispherical kylix. The inscription was written in a circle around the foot of the vessel.

Notes: Meagre fragments of a wall. Same origin as PC 18 (Colonna).

Notes: Hemispherical kylix, from tomb 2955 in a necropolis in the Risorgimento plaza. The inscription was carved on the outside within a ring of stone. Colonna remarks that it is unlikely raiśiis has the reading raimis.

Notes: Hemispherical kylix, from tomb 2955 in a necropolis in the Risorgimento plaza. The inscription starts on the outside at the base of the vessel and continues into a ring of stone. Colonna (1994) writes that minanatis is likely a misspelling of mina[na]tis.

Notes: Sister of the last bowl, found in the same tomb. The inscription is on the outside and crosses in and out of the ring of stone. The /c/ is moon shaped and the /i/ was added as a pseudoligature.

Notes: Small Attic bowl with a concave-convex wall. The inscription was written dextroverse on the outside of the vessel.

Notes: Wine amphora from Marseilles found in the same tomb as PC 26 (Colonna). The inscription was written on the neck of the vessel after it was fired.

Notes: Small bowl with a stone base. The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel in a circle.

Notes: Two small bowls with stone bases. The inscriptions were written on the inside of the vessels in a spiral and in different hands. The bars of the /w/ are very close together.

Notes:

Notes: The /t/ crosses horizontally, and the /l/ is a mess.

Notes: Two small bowls with stone heels. The inscription was written on the outside in a circle below the stone. The /t/ and /l/ were laid down backwards.

Notes: The inscription was written on the outside of the vessel.

Notes: Bowl with a receding lip from the same tomb as FS 1 (Colonna). The inscription was written on the outside around the base, upside down.

Notes: The inscription was written dextroverse on the body of the vessel below the attachment of the handle. It is probably a numeric sum or code.

Notes: The inscription was written around the body of the vessel.

Notes: The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel.

Notes: The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel.

Notes: The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel.

Notes: The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel.

Notes: The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel. Another possible reading of the graffiti is ar.

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes:

Notes: The inscription was written on the outside of the vessel. The alpha is not crossed.

Notes: The inscription was written dextroverse on the inside of the vessel.

Notes: Two flat plates with furrowed edges. The inscription was written on the inside of the vessel.

Notes: The bowl has a receding edge. The inscription was written in spiraliform starting from the center of the vessel, and the letters themselves are tall and thinly etched.

Notes: The first two letters run into an /e/, as if the scribe had started to write eta instead. The first /a/ also gives a false start to the /p/.

Notes:

Notes: Found at the temple of Apollo. Inscription was written on the outside of the vessel.

Notes: Found at the temple of Apollo. Inscription was written on the outside of the vessel.

Notes: Found at the temple of Apollo. Inscription was written on the outside of the vessel.

Notes: Found at the temple of Apollo. Inscription was written on the outside of the vessel.

Notes: Found at the temple of Apollo. Inscription was written on the outside of the vessel.

Notes: Base of a cup. The /m/ in the inscription is missing the first two peaks. It could be a χ originating from the center of the cup, or it could also be a θ.

Notes:

Notes: The fragment is the base of a bowl, and the inscription was written on the outer side. It could possibly be a division or interpretation of cla[vtie] curt[e]. M. Bonghi Jovino considers the possible connection between the Oscan reading glav urt.

Notes: